Saturday, March 31, 2012

Davids Daily Dose - Saturday March 31st


Have a look at #6 - it should be read by everyone in this country......note - it's non-partisan......



1/  There is an organisation you have never heard of, ALEC, which is behind many if not most of the pro-corporation and anti-union laws enacted by state legislatures in Republican states. ALEC actually writes the laws, which are written the way the oligarchs want them, and give them to sponsors, along with some campaign cash, who shepherd the bill through the process. Thant's how we got the "Stand your Ground" act.......

Paul Krugman with another excellent column.......

Florida’s now-infamous Stand Your Ground law, which lets you shoot someone you consider threatening without facing arrest, let alone prosecution, sounds crazy — and it is. And it’s tempting to dismiss this law as the work of ignorant yahoos. But similar laws have been pushed across the nation, not by ignorant yahoos but by big corporations.

Specifically, language virtually identical to Florida’s law is featured in a template supplied to legislators in other states by the American Legislative Exchange Council, a corporate-backed organization that has managed to keep a low profile even as it exerts vast influence (only recently, thanks to yeoman work by the Center for Media and Democracy, has a clear picture of ALEC’s activities emerged). And if there is any silver lining to Trayvon Martin’s killing, it is that it might finally place a spotlight on what ALEC is doing to our society — and our democracy.
What is ALEC? Despite claims that it’s nonpartisan, it’s very much a movement-conservative organization, funded by the usual suspects: the Kochs, Exxon Mobil, and so on. Unlike other such groups, however, it doesn’t just influence laws, it literally writes them, supplying fully drafted bills to state legislators. In Virginia, for example, more than 50 ALEC-written bills have been introduced, many almost word for word. And these bills often become law.
Many ALEC-drafted bills pursue standard conservative goals: union-busting, undermining environmental protection, tax breaks for corporations and the wealthy. ALEC seems, however, to have a special interest in privatization — that is, on turning the provision of public services, from schools to prisons, over to for-profit corporations. And some of the most prominent beneficiaries of privatization, such as the online education company K12 Inc. and the prison operator Corrections Corporation of America, are, not surprisingly, very much involved with the organization.

















2/  The latest abortion related war on womens' rights is happening in Arkansas....let the Onion News team tell you about the latest crazy Republican ideas.....in Arkansas a woman who wants an abortion has to name the foetus and paint the nursery.......2 minutes......










'







3/  Jonathan Cohn in the Nation with commentary on the Supreme Court's deliberations on the health care act - it's not just the ACA act at stake, it's the legitimacy and reputation of the Supreme Court as well......

My opinion - they will strike it down, and President Obama and the Democrats should run in November on a "Medicare for All" ticket......

"Medicare for All"......has a certain ring to it, doesn't it......

Before this week, the well-being of tens of millions of Americans was at stake in the lawsuits challenging the Affordable Care Act.
Now something else is at stake, too: The legitimacy of the Supreme Court.
Nobody knows how the justices will rule. And nobody can know, not even the justices themselves. On Friday morning, perhaps by the time you read this, they will meet privately to take their first vote. More often than not, this first vote determines the final verdict. But there are exceptions and Anthony Kennedy, on whose decision the outcome presumably depends, has a reputation for long deliberation and changes of heart—particularly in major cases like this one.
That’s good. With the result apparently in doubt—smart money still says the chances of the full law surviving are about 50-50—Kennedy should think long and hard about how he wants the Court to rule. So should Chief Justice John Roberts, who appeared more skeptical of the government’s case during oral arguments but nevertheless indicated that he, like Kennedy, understood the government’s premise—that health care was a special market, perhaps requiring special intervention.
If that concern is not enough to sway the chief justice, than perhaps his frequently professed concern for the court’s respectability will.
Even now, I have trouble wrapping my mind around what I saw in the courtroom this week and what a majority of the justices may be contemplating. Kennedy’s second question, the one that so unnerved supports of the law, was whether the government had “a heavy burden of justification to show authorization under the Constitution.” But the heavy burden in this case is on the justices threatening to strike down health care reform. They have not met it.


















4/  Jon Stewart on the Supreme Court, helped by some bizarre Taiwanese animation. Very amusing, 3 minutes.....
If you haven't been keeping up with this week's health care reform hearings in Washington, let Jon Stewart sum it up for you. On Thursday night's "Daily Show," he mocked the three-day argument of "freedom vs. social contract" with some good, old fashioned Taiwanese animation.
Since cameras are not allowed inside the hearings, Stewart hired the imagineers atNMA to show us what really definitely didn't happen. For example, did you know that "Chief Justice Of Our Hearts" Cee-Lo Green presided over the hearings? Yeah, it was weird.

















5/  "Prometheus", directed by Ridley Scott who made the wonderful "Alien" - "Prometheus" definitely looks like the sci-fi movie experience of the summer - out June 8th.....

Watch the 2 minute trailer - not sure what it all means but it looks ultrasupercool........

http://movies.yahoo.com/movie/prometheus-2012/trailers/


















6/  An excellent article in Esquire, the gist of which is that boomers, yes you, for the last 30 years have stacked the deck so that the old are taken care of at the expense of the young......

This article is an epiphany, an eye-opener, and should be read by all boomers, so that we know what we have done, and everyone in their 20's and 30's so that they know what is happening to their generation......

Highly recommended.....

Twenty-five years ago young Americans had a chance.
In 1984, American breadwinners who were sixty-five and over made ten times as much as those under thirty-five. The year Obama took office, older Americans made almost forty-seven times as much as the younger generation.
This bleeding up of the national wealth is no accounting glitch, no anomalous negative bounce from the recent unemployment and mortgage crises, but rather the predictable outcome of thirty years of economic and social policy that has been rigged to serve the comfort and largesse of the old at the expense of the young.
Since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, human potential has been consistently growing, generating greater material wealth, more education, wider opportunities — a vast and glorious liberation of human potential. In all that time, everyone, even followers of the most corrupt or most evil of ideologies, believed they were working for a better tomorrow. Not now. The angel of progress has suddenly vanished from the scene. Or rather, the angel of progress has been sent away.

















7/  Holy shit!  A nasty accident caught by a state troopercam.....35 seconds of......OMG!!!!


















8/  Where do these journalists get their insights from? Fascinating discussion by James Kwak about whether or not the Republican party is still the party of business, or has it been captured by billionaires and their unlimited funds......

The GOP has always been the party of the top 10%, but does it now represent the 0.01%, i.e. the oligarchy? If this is even partially true, it's scary......

Jonathan Weisman of the Times wrote an article about the reluctance of many Republicans in Congress to extend policies that are traditionally favored by big business (and the Chamber of Commerce), such as infrastructure spending and funding for the Export-Import Bank. This points to a split between the traditional corporate wing of the GOP and the newer, ultra-conservative tax revolt wing.
My guess is that this will blow over and the Republicans will figure out a way to keep big business happy without upsetting the Tea Party too much. But it points out a potential shift among the people who fund the GOP.
Historically, the Republicans were the party of business. Businesses like to make money. That can mean a lot of different things for government policy. In some cases, they want less regulation, since regulatory compliance costs money. On the other hand, large companies often want more regulation, since they can absorb the costs of compliance better than small competitors. (See The Economist on tax preparers for a recent example.) Regulation can also be a mechanism for price fixing, as with the old Interstate Commerce Commission, which functioned as a legal cartel for railroads. Businesses definitely want lower corporate tax rates, since that increases their net income. But they also like some types of government spending. Most obviously, defense contractors like lots and lots of defense spending. Less obviously, businesses have historically been major beneficiaries of free public education, since it gave them a more skilled workforce. So in general, the business community is not obviously in favor of lower taxes or lower spending.
Contrast this with the interests of billionaires. The super-rich do have a lot of wealth tied up in company stock, so to some extent they share the interests of businesses. But as rich people, they have their own interests. In this case, they unequivocally gain from lower taxes and lower government spending; they get to keep more money and they don’t need government services, as individuals. Besides, once you’ve made your first billion, it doesn’t really matter how your business does after that point.
















9/  Wow. The Dallas Federal Reserve bank has just put out a report recommending the breakup of the "too big to fail" banks......

Let's start with the evil Bank of America......but we can see all of the lobbyists springing into action to bury this report, so don't expect too much to happen....

As the Supreme Court shows every sign of throwing out “Obamacare” and leaving 30 million Americans without health insurance, another drama is being played out in the quiet corridors of the Federal Reserve system that may affect even more of us.
Taxpayers will be on the hook for another giant Wall Street bailout, and the economy won’t be mended, unless the nation’s biggest banks are broken up.
That’s not just me talking, or the Occupier movement, or that wayward executive who resigned from Goldman Sachs a few weeks ago. It’s the conclusion of the Dallas Federal Reserve, one of the most conservative of the Fed’s regional banks.
The lead essay in its just released annual report says a cartel of giant banks continues to hobble the recovery and poses an ongoing danger to the economy.
Wall Street’s increasing power remains “difficult to control because they have the lawyers and the money to resist the pressures of federal regulation.” The Dodd-Frank act that was supposed to control Wall Street “leaves TBTF [too big to fail] entrenched.”
The Dallas Fed goes on to argue that the Fed’s easy money policy can’t be much help to the U.S. economy as long as Wall Street is “still clogged with toxic assets accumulated in the boom years.”
So what’s the answer, according to the Dallas Fed? It’s “breaking up the nation’s biggest banks into smaller units.”
Thud. That’s the sound the report hitting the desks of Wall Street executives. They and their Washington lobbyists are doing what they can to make sure this report is discredited and buried. 















10/  Fascinating rerun video of the military rituals for the daily closure of the border between India and Pakistan....Indians are first...

This is not a Monty Python comedy skit, but it does resemble one with the "silly walks".

Keep in mind that each of these countries has nuclear weapons.......2 minutes....




















11/  Thankfully the certified asshole Rick Santorum is close to being irrelevant in the Presidential race, but in this clip he comes close to using the n-word to describe the President. 

He is just a disgusting human being........20 seconds of slime.....















12/  For what I hope is the final word on this cretin we have Tom Tomorrow with a Rick Santorum "Sex Talk"......



















13/  What is Tebowing? -  to get down on a knee and start praying, even if everyone else around you is doing 

something completely different. For those of you outside the US and/or ladies, this term is from Tim Tebow, the 

quarterback for the New York Jets [formerly the Denver Broncos]  who is very religious, and publicly prayed 

during the football games.....  




Here are some pictures of people Tebowing.......





And here is a South Park illustration of inappropriate Memeing while Tebowing.....funny and disgusting.....eeeew......2 minutes.......
















14/  A DDD favourite  - Arcade Fire with "Ready to Start", nothing fancy, just an excellent live rock video.....audience freaking out, a lady drummer in a prom dress, good geetar......



















15/  Yeay - Rachael Maddow has a book out, and here is the review in the Times......very good......

A book by the host of a political talk show is often an ancillary product or marketing tool. But “Drift,” by Rachel Maddow, whose show is on MSNBC, is much more. It is an argument — a sustained, lucid case in which points are made logically and backed by evidence and reason. What’s more, it follows one main idea through nearly a half-century. The subtitle, “The Unmooring of American Military Power,” explains exactly what “Drift” is about.
Ms. Maddow’s point is that the way we go to war has changed: that there has been an expansion of presidential power, a corresponding collapse of Congressional backbone and a diminution of public attention. She does not see this in conspiratorial terms, but she has an explanation for the step-by-step way it evolved. She thinks the transformation began with a question asked by President Lyndon B. Johnson in 1965 as he prepared to more than double the ground forces in Vietnam: “You don’t think I oughta have a joint session, do you?” Did he need authorization from Congress, he asked the chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, to make a troop deployment like that?
That very question indicates that Johnson understood the importance of Congressional authority.
................................................................
President Clinton was faced with Bosnia and the use of private contractors became a form of damage control. Later parts of the book outline how the buildup of C.I.A. secret forces and these private contractors have dimmed public awareness of how and when war is waged.
Ms. Maddow’s way of making points, whether on the page or on the air, follows a distinct pattern. She begins a chapter with something small and piquant, like the Houbara bustard, a bird found in Pakistan and Afghanistan. She will explain the small thing, come up with a cute phrase about it (“poor bustard”) and suddenly leap to explain why the American incursion into Pakistan to kill Osama bin Laden managed not to be regarded as an outright act of war.
Thank the bustard (which turned out to inhabit conservation land within Pakistan because Arab falconers favor the bustard as falcon prey) for this book’s explanation of how drone warfare is waged. And thank Ms. Maddow for picking this and every other fight that “Drift” provokes. It will be a smarter public debate than the kinds we’re used to.


Or.......
Rachael Maddow joins Jon Stewart for a 7 minute interview about her new book, so if you don't want to read the review watch this instead......mildly amusing.....

Rachel Maddow appeared on Jon Stewart's "The Daily Show" on Thursday night to discuss her new book about war, "Drift: The Unmooring Of The American Military."
Maddow's book, which has been a labor of love for the MSNBC host for a number of years, investigates how U.S. national security policy has changed since the Vietnam War, resulting in a severe disconnect between the military, government, and American public. "We didn't feel like we were a country at war," Maddow said to Stewart. "We felt like we're a country that sends the military off to war."

















16/  Aha - Julia Roberts, an ad blitz of huge proportions and maybe you have been persuaded you want to see the latest RomCom "Mirror Mirror"......chill yer jets - read this review first.......

Is it too early to call Mirror Mirror the worst movie of the year?
This new retelling of Snow White targeted to children is so bad, the studio should have included the words “cracked,” “broken” or “splintered” in its title.
Worried that one viewing wasn’t enough to appreciate the utter terribleness ofMirror Mirror, I went to see it again, this time with a guest. Samara Haynes, an aspiring writer from Montclair, N.J., enjoys soccer, acting, and considers herself a fairy-tale scholar. It should be noted that she absolutely loved the film. She’s 8 years old.
Here is our joint review:
The Evil Queen (Julia Roberts)
The film, directed by Tarsem Singh (The Cell), begins from the Queen’s point of view. Who cares what she has to say? Her narration is botched by a faux-English accent that brings to mind the last time Madonna tried to act.
Roberts’s Queen is supposed to be evil, but since she never commits to her character, she’s doesn’t come across that way. Instead, she’s only vaguely bad, like a high-school mean girl—but not even. Since Roberts is an old-school star who always plays a variation of herself, the Queen still laughs, smiles, and sounds like Julia Roberts.




Any doubts? Watch this awful, choppy trailer......














Todays video - the bikini Dyson commercial


















A couple of jokes for married people......


A woman is sitting at home on the veranda enjoying a bottle of wine with her husband and she says, "I love you."

 He asks, "Is that you or the wine talking?"
 
 She replies, "It's me............. talking to the wine."
  

.................................................................................


A husband and wife were sitting watching a TV program about psychology and explaining the phenomenon of mixed emotions.  

The husband turned to his wife and said, "Honey, that's a bunch of crap.  I bet you can't tell me anything that will make me happy and sad at the same time.  

And she said, "Out of all your friends you have the biggest pecker."













Todays short drunk joke

Two drunk guys are sitting at a bar when one looks
at the other and says, 

"I had sex with your mother last night".

The other guy gets up, grabs his coat and says, 

"OK dad, it's time to go".












Todays Polish joke

Two Polish hunters got a pilot to fly them into the Canadian wilderness, where they managed  to bag two big bull moose.
As they were loading the plane to return, the  pilot said the plane could take only the hunters, their gear and one  moose.
The hunters strongly objected saying, "Last year we shot two, and  the pilot let us take them both... and he had exactly the same airplane as  yours."
Reluctantly the pilot, not wanting to be outdone by another bush pilot, gave in and everything was loaded. However, even under full power, the  little plane couldn't handle the load and went down, crashing in the wooded  wilderness.
Somehow, surrounded by the moose, clothing and sleeping bags,  Yanush and Stashek survived the crash.
After climbing out of the  wreckage, Yanush asked Stashek, "'Any idea where we are?"
Stashek  replied, "I think we're pretty close to where we crashed last year!"










And we finish with another married joke


  A husband had just finished reading a new book entitled; You Can Be the Man of Your House.
 
  Finding new courage that he never knew he had, he stormed into the kitchen and announced to his wife, "From now on, you need to know that I am the man of this house and my word is the 'Law.' You will prepare me a gourmet meal tonight, bring it to me, and when I am done eating my meal, you will clear the dishes and serve me a scrumptious dessert. After dinner, you are going to go upstairs with me and we will make love the way I want!"

 "Afterwards, you are going to draw me a bath so I can relax. You will put on soothing music, wash my back and towel me dry and bring me my robe. You will massage my feet and hands to relieve any last bit of tension so that I can sleep like a baby. Then tomorrow, guess who's going to dress me and comb my hair?"

  The wife replied, "The funeral director would be my first guess, unless I have your ass cremated."

Thursday, March 29, 2012

Davids Daily Dose - Wednesday March 28th


1/  The excellent Frank Rich with an essay on the Republican Party's women problem - it's not just about contraception, as this hostility to women's issues has been brewing for many years. The great thing with Frank Rich is that he doesn't just tell you what is happening, but he also tells you why, and looks into the history.....

A long article, an insightful one and a must read if you are at all interested in politics.....

At the time, back in January in New Hampshire, it didn’t seem like that big a deal, certainly nothing to rival previous debate flash points like “9-9-9” and “Oops!” But in retrospect it may have been one of the more fateful twists of the Republican presidential campaign. The exchange was prompted by George Stephanopoulos, who seemingly out of nowhere asked Mitt Romney if he shared Rick Santorum’s view that “states have the right to ban contraception.” Romney stiffened, as he is wont to do, and took the tone of a men’s club factotum tut-tutting a member for violating the dress code. “George, this is an unusual topic that you’re raising,” he said. “I know of no reason to talk about contraception in this regard.” The partisan audience would soon jeer the moderator for his effrontery.
Afterward, Romney’s spokesman Eric Fehrnstrom accused Stephanopoulos of asking “the oddest question in a debate this year” and of having “a strange obsession with contraception.” It was actually Santorum who had the strange obsession. He had first turned the subject into a cause in October by talking about “the dangers of contraception in this country.” Birth control is “not okay,” he said then. “It’s a license to do things in a sexual realm that is counter to how things are supposed to be.”
As we know now, Santorum, flaky though he may sound, is not some outlier in his party or in its presidential field. He was an advance man for a rancorous national brawl about to ambush an unsuspecting America that thought women’s access to birth control had been resolved by the ­Supreme Court almost a half century ago.
The hostilities would break out just weeks after the New Hampshire debate, with the back-to-back controversies of theWhite House health-care rule on contraceptives and the Komen Foundation’s dumping of Planned Parenthood. Though those two conflicts ended with speedy cease-fires, an emboldened GOP kept fighting. It had women’s sex lives on the brain and would not stop rolling out jaw-dropping sideshows: an all-male panel at a hearing on birth control in the House. A fat-cat Santorum bankroller joking that “gals” could stay out of trouble by putting Bayer aspirin “between their knees.” A Virginia governorendorsing a state bill requiring that an ultrasound “wand” be inserted into the vagina of any woman seeking an abortion.
It’s not news that the GOP is the anti-abortion party, that it panders to the religious right, and that it’s particularly dependent on white men with less education and less income—a displaced demographic that has been as threatened by the rise of the empowered modern woman as it has been by the cosmopolitan multiracial male elites symbolized by Barack Obama. That aggrieved class is, indeed, Santorum’s constituency. But, as Stephanopoulos was trying to get at when he challenged Romney, this new rush of anti-woman activity on the right isn’t coming exclusively from the Santorum crowd. It’s a phenomenon extending across the GOP. On March 1, every Republican in the Senate except the about-to-flee Olympia Snowe—that would be 45 in total—voted for the so-called Blunt Amendment, which would allow any employer with any undefined “moral” objection to veto any provision in health-care coverage, from birth control to mammograms to diabetes screening for women (or, for that matter, men) judged immorally overweight.










2/  A wonderful 4 minute Bill Maher rant on many topics, but ending with a riff on the Dos Equis ad "the most interesting man in the World".....of course it's Mitt, and he's not interesting.......












3/  Robyn Blumner with some thoughts on the ACA [Obamacare] deliberations currently before the Supreme Court - as of Wednesday it may be the justices will strike down the law, but we'll see.....

Good story on what's at stake......
Chief Justice John Roberts knows this is his hour. Like it or not, the legal challenge to President Barack Obama's health reform law to be heard for three days starting Monday will define the legacy of the Roberts court.
If the court's five-justice conservative majority votes to overturn the individual mandate in the Affordable Care Act it will be remembered as an act of rank political decisionmaking and judicial activism. Unambiguous, long-standing legal precedent exists to uphold the law. But there is no sugar-coating what it will take for that result: an intellectually honest court.
The focus of this case is not individual liberty. It is easy to get confused since the premier issue before the court is whether Congress can tell people that they must have health insurance or pay a tax penalty. But remember, Mitt Romney, as governor of Massachusetts, imposed essentially the same individual mandate that exists in "ObamaCare" on Bay Staters in his "RomneyCare."
So if you have stuck in your craw the idea that government can't force people under any circumstances to buy a product they don't want from a private company, forget it. Massachusetts is doing it under its police powers, as could any other state. And the federal government did so in 1792 when it told every white male of a certain age to buy a musket or rifle and ammunition. President George Washington signed the militia measure — indicating that the founders were not averse to forcing commerce on the populace.
The case before the Supreme Court is a federalism dispute: whether the federal government has the power under the Commerce Clause to impose a health insurance regulation that would otherwise be the province of states.












4/  When Jon Stewart comes back from his breaks he is recharged, and has some of his best shows......this one is excellent, on Trayvon and Dick Cheney's new heart.......8 minutes.....some great Cheney moments.....

"The Daily Show" returned from vacation Monday night to cover the big stories that occurred while they were away. While Jon Stewart tried to joke about Dick Cheney's heart transplant, he had to resist the easy set-up to tackle the outrageous circumstances of Trayvon Martin's death.
"I feel like Florida and Arizona are locked in a harms race," Stewart joked after learning that Martin's shooter George Zimmerman was walking free due to Florida's "Stand Your Ground" law, which allows people to use deadly force any time they feel threatened.
"How can this state have that law -- and Spring Break?" Stewart wondered. "It's like New York, the signs we have in the subway: 'If you see something, shoot something.'"
Stewart also took note of how the cable news networks have been handling the story, finding it particularly funny when they tried to solve the crime themselves like some C.S.I. spinoff, "C.N.I" (Cable News Investigation). He found it touching when people all over the world started wearing hoodies to show solidarity, but when all the anchors started wearing them on-air, he couldn't resist playing a round of "Jedi or Sith Lord?".


















5/  Now this is interesting - Nicolas Kristof looks at liberals and conservatives and finds conservatives totally understand liberals, but liberals are baffled by what motivates the right.....

This clicked with me.....how about you?

Conservatives may not like liberals, but they seem to understand them. In contrast, many liberals find conservative voters not just wrong but also bewildering.

One academic study asked 2,000 Americans to fill out questionnaires about moral questions. In some cases, they were asked to fill them out as they thought a “typical liberal” or a “typical conservative” would respond.
Moderates and conservatives were adept at guessing how liberals would answer questions. Liberals, especially those who described themselves as “very liberal,” were least able to put themselves in the minds of their adversaries and guess how conservatives would answer.
Now a fascinating new book comes along that, to a liberal like myself, helps demystify the right — and illuminates the kind of messaging that might connect with voters of all stripes. “The Righteous Mind,” by Jonathan Haidt, a University of Virginia psychology professor, argues that, for liberals, morality is largely a matter of three values: caring for the weak, fairness and liberty. Conservatives share those concerns (although they think of fairness and liberty differently) and add three others: loyalty, respect for authority and sanctity












6/  Boardwalk Empire is set in Atlantic City in the roaring 20's, and if you have seen the show you might wonder how they got those sets of AC long ago.....here's your answer....technology......3 minutes.....













7/  Good article on who is the voice of the Republican party...is it Rush? The Koch Brothers? Fox News? Or "all of the above"?

Kevin Baker in the Times looks at how the domination of the airwaves by right wing points of view has evolved over the decades, including the origins of Fox News, and where we are now....

Who speaks for the Republican party? The answer is that everyone does — and therefore, no one does.
Much air time and many trees have been wasted trying to explain the division, rancor and lethargy that have beset the Republican nominating campaign, now into its second year and threatening to run all the way to the party’s national convention in late August. But it’s no great mystery. Republicans have fallen prey to one of the favorite tactics of just the sort of heedless, improvident, twenty-first century capitalism they revere. Their party has been outsourced.
For decades, Republicans have recruited outside groups and individuals to amplify their party’s message and its influence. This is a legitimate democratic tactic that they have carried off brilliantly, helping to shift the political spectrum in the United States significantly to the right.
When Republicans came to believe in the 1960s that they were up against a “liberal biased” media that would never give them a fair shake, they began the long march to build their own, alternative information establishment. As chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, Mark Fowler, led the fight to abolish the “Fairness Doctrine” in 1987, further empowering what was already a legion of right-wing talk radio programs.
In 1949, drawing on a long history of court decisions; on public hearings; and on legislation mandating “equal time” for political candidates, the F.C.C. ruled that holders of radio and television broadcast licenses must “devote a reasonable percentage of their broadcast time to the presentation of news and programs devoted to the consideration and discussion of public issues of interest in the community,” and that this must include “different attitudes and viewpoints concerning these vital and often controversial issues.”
The Supreme Court repeatedly upheld the F.C.C.’s power to make such a rule — but never gave it the power of law. In 1986, a pair of Ronald Reagan’s judicial appointees on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, Robert Bork and Antonin Scalia, ruled that the Fairness Doctrine was not “a binding statutory obligation.”










8/  One of Stephen Colbert's funniest segments is "The Word", with funny zingers that follow his dialogue.....this one is excellent, and he argues about hoodies and Geraldo.....

A funny four minutes......













9/  Last summer President Obama tried hard to forge a bi-partisan agreement with the House and John Boehner, and this insightful story by Jonathan Chait in New York magazine tells how the President almost became a RINO by selling out the liberals in his own party......

Last summer, President Obama desperately attempted to forge a long-term deficit reduction deal with Congressional Republicans. The notion that he could get the House GOP to accept any remotely balanced agreement was preposterous and doomed from the start, but Obama responded to the increasingly obvious reality by reducing his demands of the Republicans to virtually nothing.
The Washington Post has a long narrative report about the negotiations between Obama and the House Republicans. The narrative frame of the Post’s account is that Obama blew the potential deal at the last minute. That’s a story that people close to Obama’s fired chief of staff, Bill Daley, have been peddling for a long time. But that conclusion is utterly belied by the facts in the Post’s own account. But let’s put that aside for now, because the facts in thePost’s account support a different and far more disturbing conclusion: Obama was even more desperate to cut a deal than previously believed — dangerously desperate, in fact.
It has previously been reported that Obama had offered to John Boehner to make a series of cuts to Medicare, Social Security, and the domestic budget, to reduce top-end tax rates, and to prevent the expiration of the Bush tax cuts, in return for increasing tax revenue (over current tax levels) by about $800 billion over ten years. That is a pitiful sum of new revenue, less than half as much as recommended by deficit proposals by Bowles-Simpson, the Bipartisan Policy Center, and other bipartisan worthies. The blockbuster fact in the Post’s report, which the story does not in any way grapple with, is that even the $800 billion in tax revenue offered by Boehner was not, in fact, $800 billion in tax revenue:













10/  This is definitely a guy video - shows a railroad track laying machine working on a high speed rail line between Chicago and St. Louis - one of only two machines like this in the world.....5 minutes......













11/  Fred Grimm in the Miami Herald with more on the "Stand Your Ground" law that is central to the Trayvon Martin killing, and the travesties of justice it has produced in South Florida....

The killing of Trayvon Martin was only the most infamous Florida homicide complicated by the legal inanity known as “Stand Your Ground.”
Police in Sanford, maddeningly hesitant in their dealings with the 28-year-old neighborhood watch zealot who shot young Martin, have been widely disparaged for citing the 2005 Florida statute that grotesquely altered the doctrine of self-defense.
But just last week, Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Beth Bloom bolstered the Sanford cops’ contention that state law now trumps common sense. She sprang another stand-your-ground killer.
Stand Your Ground, the way the law has been interpreted, has proven to be a wild misnomer. Like Trayvon Martin, Pedro Roteta was pursued down a city street by his killer.
On Jan. 25, Roteta had apparently been trying to steal the radio from a truck owned by Greyston Garcia, parked outside his apartment in southwest Miami. Truck burglary’s a crime of course, but not a capital case. Not before 2005.












12/  Katy Perry's funniest video - the extended version of "Last Friday Night", where the beautiful Katy plays a nerdette after a wild party.......

An amusing big budget video, with actual actors playing bit parts and Kenny G. on sax......and a decent song as well......












13/  There's no global warming......so this story from the Times is obviously the liberal media being it's usual self, quoting scientists and other fact based sources.....

According to this if I can hang on for another century I will be living in "Mount Dora by the Sea".....wow, oceanfront property.......Mary get me the number for the cyronics lab.....

About 3.7 million Americans live within a few feet of high tide and risk being hit by more frequent coastal flooding in coming decades because of the sea level rise caused by global warming, according to new research.

If the pace of the rise accelerates as much as expected, researchers found, coastal flooding at levels that were once exceedingly rarecould become an every-few-years occurrence by the middle of this century.
By far the most vulnerable state is Florida, the new analysis found, with roughly half of the nation’s at-risk population living near the coast on the porous, low-lying limestone shelf that constitutes much of that state. But Louisiana, California, New York and New Jersey are also particularly vulnerable, researchers found, and virtually the entire American coastline is at some degree of risk.
“Sea level rise is like an invisible tsunami, building force while we do almost nothing,” said Benjamin H. Strauss, an author, with other scientists, of two new papers outlining the research. “We have a closing window of time to prevent the worst by preparing for higher seas.”












14/  Another Susan Boyle moment from Britain's Got Talent.....and even worse looking than Boyle......nice to see Simon Cowell doing his usual schtick......

Five minutes, but you can fast forward the interview and go straight to the performance [about 1 min, 15 seconds], which is amazing....















15/  Oh lordy - a recent study says that any amount of red meat is bad for you......and that's meat without WalMart pink slime......

Eating red meat — any amount and any type — appears to significantly increase the risk of premature death, according to a long-range study that examined the eating habits and health of more than 110,000 adults for more than 20 years.

For instance, adding just one 3-ounce serving of unprocessed red meat — picture a piece of steak no bigger than a deck of cards — to one's daily diet was associated with a 13% greater chance of dying during the course of the study.

Even worse, adding an extra daily serving of processed red meat, such as a hot dog or two slices of bacon, was linked to a 20% higher risk of death during the study.

"Any red meat you eat contributes to the risk," said An Pan, a postdoctoral fellow at the Harvard School of Public Health in Boston and lead author of the study, published onlineMonday in the Archives of Internal Medicine.













16/  And after that article, hope - the Dutch have perfected an artificial chicken product, made from vegetables, that is actually worth eating......

If there is one product of Big Ag that we all should avoid it's cheap chicken.....stuffed with hormones, factory farmed in horrid conditions and tasteless.....mass produced chicken is actually bad for you.......so this is good news......

IT is pretty well established that animals are capable of suffering; we’ve come a long way since Descartes famously compared them to nonfeeling machines put on earth to serve man. (Rousseau later countered this, saying that animals shared “some measure” of human nature and should partake of “natural right.”) No matter where you stand on this spectrum, you probably agree that it’s a noble goal to reduce the level of the suffering of animals raised for meat in industrial conditions.

There are four ways to move toward fixing this. One, we can improve the animals’ living conditions; two (this is distasteful but would shock no one), we might see producers reduce or eveneliminate animals’ consciousness, say, by removing the cerebral cortex, in effect converting them to a kind of vegetable (see Margaret Atwood’s horrifying description in her prescient “Oryx and Crake”); three, we can consume fewer industrially raised animals, concentrating on those raised more humanely.
Or four, we can reduce consumption, period. That is perhaps difficult when people eat an average of a half-pound of meat daily. But as better fake plant-based “meat” products are created, that option becomes more palatable. My personal approval of fake meat, for what it’s worth, has been long in coming. I like traditional meat substitutes, like tofu, bean burgers, vegetable cutlets and so on, but have been mostly repelled by unconvincing nuggets and hot dogs, which lack bite, chew, juiciness and flavor. I’m also annoyed by the cost: why pay more for fake meat than real meat, especially since the production process is faster, easier and involves no butchering? And, I have felt, if you want to eat less meat, why not just eat more of other real things?
But in October I visited a place in The Hague calledThe Vegetarian Butcher, where the “butcher” said to me, “We slaughter soy” — ha-ha. The plant-based products were actually pretty good — the chicken would have fooled me if I hadn’t known what it was — and I began to consider that it might be better to eat fake meat that harms no animals and causes less environmental damage than meat raised industrially.
















17/  Here in Mount Dora we pride ourselves on our gentility, which is why this column from Lauren Ritchie was a revelation that we have the same traumas that the rest of Florida has, just on a smaller scale. 

I mean look at Sanford, 18 miles away.......they have REAL problems, we have Buddy Atkins......

Hours of police time in Mount Dora have gone into solving a perplexing problem.
Neighbors aren't speaking to one another. Surveillance cameras have been installed. An exasperated police chief briefed a tense City Council.
The owner of a local real-estate company is so furious he hired a lawyer.
I am not making this up.

And the nature of this all-consuming problem? A kid is throwing a football in his neighbor's yard.
When folks in Mount Dora go off the rails, the boxcar doesn't just tip over quietly and lay there. Oh, no. It's as if everyone piles into one of those undersized roller coaster cars drawn by Dr. Seuss and goes wildly racing from the peak of a mountain into a gully, perhaps with one of the occupants holding aloft a tray of green eggs and ham.


















18/  "Hunger Games" has had a blockbuster opening week, with record ticket sales, so now in the second week you might want to consider going to the less crowded theaters.....to help you make up your mind here are two reviews, from the NYTimes and Entertainment Weekly,  saying about the same message.....it's pretty good, but could have been better.....

No trailer, you've already seen them......

For as long as this brief scene lasts, it seems possible that Gary Ross, the unlikely and at times frustratingly ill-matched director for this brutal, unnerving story, has caught the heart-skipping pulse of Michael Mann’s “Last of the Mohicans” if not that film’s ravishing technique and propulsive energy. Alas, Mr. Ross, the director of the genial entertainments “Pleasantville” and “Seabiscuit,” and whose script credits include “Big,” has a way of smoothing even modestly irregular edges. Katniss, who for years has bagged game to keep her family from starving, was created for rough stuff — for beating the odds and the state, for hunting squirrel and people both — far rougher than Mr. Ross often seems comfortable with, perhaps because of disposition, inclination or some behind-the-scenes executive mandate.
It may be that Mr. Ross is too nice a guy for a hard case like Katniss. A brilliant, possibly historic creation — stripped of sentimentality and psychosexual ornamentation, armed with Diana’s bow and a ferocious will — Katniss is a new female warrior, and she keeps you watching even while you’re hoping for something better the next time around.  




The film version of The Hunger Games is a fine example of the contemporary Hollywood franchise picture. It features a cast full of next-big-things breakout actors supported by old-pro ringers having a blast with funny wigs. It conjures up an intriguing new fantasy world without overdosing on world-building (like John Carter) or mythology (like Green Lantern.) More importantly, it manages to capture the propulsive energy of Suzanne Collins’ novel. Adapting a great book into a good movie is not an easy task, and the makers of Hunger Games deserve credit just for the bad decisions they didn’t make. (They didn’t Twilight the movie into a romantic “triangle;” they didn’t turn Peeta into someone who could even remotely be construed as a badass; the kids still kill each other.) But there is one important aspect of the original novel that is almost entirely absent from the movie: The darkly funny way in which Collins directly accuses the audience. As in, us. Weirdly, by turning the book into such a fan-baiting crowdpleaser, the movie version of Hunger Games seems to oddly miss the point of its own source material.










Todays video - the wonderful French taunting scene from Monty Python and the Holy Grail.....














Todays medical joke


Yesterday I had an appointment to see the urologist for a prostate exam. Of
course I was a bit on edge because all my friends have either gone under the
knife or had those pellets implanted.

The waiting room was filled with patients.

As I approached the receptionist's desk, I noticed that the receptionist was
a large unfriendly woman who looked like a Sumo wrestler. I gave her my
name.

In a very loud voice, the receptionist said, "YES, I HAVE YOUR NAME HERE;
YOU WANT TO SEE THE DOCTOR ABOUT IMPOTENCE, RIGHT?"

All the patients in the waiting room snapped their heads around to look at
me, a now very embarrassed man.

But as usual, I recovered quickly, and in an equally loud voice replied,
"NO, I'VE COME TO INQUIRE ABOUT A SEX CHANGE OPERATION, BUT I DON'T WANT
THE SAME DOCTOR THAT DID YOURS."

The room erupted in applause! 












Todays pun collection
1. The fattest knight at King Arthur's round table was Sir Cumference. He acquired his size from too much pi.

2. I thought I saw an eye doctor on an Alaskan island, but it turned out to be an optical Aleutian
.

3. She was only a whiskey maker, but he loved her still.

4. A rubber band pistol was confiscated from algebra class, because it was a weapon of math disruption.

5. No matter how much you push the envelope, it'll still be stationery.

6. A dog gave birth to puppies near the road and was cited for littering.

7. A grenade thrown into a kitchen in France would result in Linoleum Blownapart
.
8. Two silk worms had a race. They ended up in a tie.

9. Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.


10. Atheism is a non-prophetorganization.

11. Two hats were hanging on a hat rack in the hallway. One hat said to the other: "You stay here; I'll go on a head."

12. I wondered why the baseball kept getting bigger. Then it hit me.

13. A sign on the lawn at a drug rehab center said: 'Keep off the Grass.'

14. A backward poet writes inverse.

15. In a democracy it's your vote that counts. In feudalism it's your count that                        votes.

16. If you jumped off the bridge in Paris ,
you'd be in Seine .
17. A vulture boards an airplane, carrying two dead raccoons. The stewardess looks at him and says, "I'm sorry, sir, only one carrion allowed per passenger."
18. Two fish swim into a concrete wall. One turns to the other and says "Dam!"
19. Two Eskimos sitting in a kayak were chilly, so they lit a fire in the craft. Unsurprisingly it sank, proving once again that you can't have your kayak and heat it too.
20. Two hydrogen atoms meet. One says, "I've lost my electron." The other says "Are you sure?" The first replies, "Yes, I'm positive."
21. Did you hear about the Buddhist who refused Novocain during a root canal? His goal: transcend dental medication.
22. There was the person who sent ten puns to friends, with the hope that at least one of the puns would make them laugh. No pun in ten did. 











Todays bar joke
I was standing in a bar and this little Chinese guy comes in and stands next to me.
After a few minutes, I said to him, "Do you know any of those martial arts things, like Kung-Fu, Karateor Ju-Jitsu?"

He says "No, why the fock you ask me dat? Is eet coz I Chinee"?

"No", I said, "It's because you're drinking my fucking beer, you slanty-eyed little cocksucker!"